The hyperbolic mistruths, presented on the home pages of some of the world’s most popular Web sites, amounted to an abuse of trust and a misuse of power. When Wikipedia and Google purport to be neutral sources of information, but then exploit their stature to present information that is not only not neutral but affirmatively incomplete and misleading, they are duping their users into accepting as truth what are merely self-serving political declarations.

What Wikipedia Won’t Tell You - NYTimes.com (via infoneer-pulse)

No fan of the RIAA, much less SOPA, but this in particular is an interesting point.

(via libraryjournal)

(via libraryjournal)

02/08/12 at 4:56pm
32 notes
  1. radicalmilitantlibrarian reblogged this from libraryjournal and added:
    Any attempt by pro-SOPA lobbyists to claim the high moral ground in the protests—which they still insist on claiming was...
  2. crazygm reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  3. amnesiatits reblogged this from librarianista and added:
    I don’t know what article you guys read, but I found this piece of dribble to be extremely alarmist exaggeration, and...
  4. rainabloom reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  5. nonfinis reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  6. nonfinis said: Important to note the author of the article: “Cary H. Sherman is chief executive of the Recording Industry Association of America, which represents music labels.”
  7. gracehoper reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  8. addledbrain reblogged this from librarianista and added:
    THAT IS WHY YOU SHOULD NEVER USE WIKIPEDIA IN A WORKS CITED PAGE. I swear to God, I have had too many arguments to count...
  9. librarianista reblogged this from libraryjournal
  10. nerdylikearockstar reblogged this from libraryjournal
  11. counterpunches reblogged this from libraryjournal
  12. libraryjournal reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  13. infoneer-pulse posted this